Is weave an Airtable alternative?
Yes for linked records, rollups, formulas and views, with markdown documents on every row and an MCP server added. No for Airtable's collaborator permissions, hosted forms and marketplace apps: weave's permissions stop at three roles per workspace, and its board, calendar and timeline views are not built.
Is weave a Fibery alternative?
That is the closest description of weave: connected tables across spaces, documents attached to entities, automations and a relation graph, in a single file the team owns. docs/PARITY.md holds the feature matrix.
How close is weave to Fibery?
weave scores 81.5% against the feature list of Fibery, the product it is closest to, over a target of 80%. The score comes from docs/PARITY.md, taken against v0.4.63 on 2026-10-03, and the matrix there names every feature. Partial today: assignees and people, avatars and icons on entities, granular permissions. Not built: board and kanban view, list view, calendar view, timeline and gantt, whiteboards, reports and charts.
How does a team migrate off weave?
weave export writes the full workspace as JSON on either plan, and weave import reads it back on either.
What happens before require-auth runs?
Until an architect runs weave workspace require-auth, anyone who reaches the port can do everything an architect can; a local install binds 127.0.0.1. Editor access also needs care once auth is on: a document of kind html renders on weave's own origin, so a script an editor puts in one runs for whoever opens it. Grant editor access the way the team grants write access to a repository.
Which AI model does weave use?
None. Agents connect from outside over MCP, REST or the CLI, each with the model and provider the team chooses; weave itself makes no model calls.
Is weave open source?
Yes. The full repository is MIT-licensed, including the code used by the cloud plan.